![]()
|
|
| Officially fixed (we hope) the trouble with
Disney as reported in the previous news, we inform our visitors that PKERS takes a little
holiday. A break of pondering, needed to make the checkpoint of our activity, to
understand what results we got and what we can or cannot get. Surely right now sadness and
misconfidence prevale on enthusiasm, that almost completely vanished because of the
present situation. Carrying on our work in this context is very hard, our freedom of
expression has been seriously damaged. It was speculated to shut down the site after such a hostile act against us, but for now this is a remote choice: what we need now is to reorder the ideas. Of course we don't want to leave all the work done until now and the so many projects still under construction, but at this time we really need to catch our breath. We'll be back. That's a promise.
|
|
|
| Yesterday morning, something very strange
occurred. This site's webmaster, Silverware, got a letter from Walt Disney Company Italia. In the paper inside, under a nice Mickey logo, Disney Italia's legal office clearly ordered us to stop in 10 days the publishing of our Calendar 2003 and any related initiative, under the menace of a penal charge for violation of their image copyrights. You can just imagine the shock. Among other things, Disney accused us to "generate confusion among the audience about the origin of their product" and "harm the image of their company". See for yourself the scans of the letter, pag. 1 and pag. 2. Below follows the translation of the essential passages: ----------------------------------------------- Milan, 24th January 2003 Mr. Raccomandata R/R SUBJECT: PKERS CALENDAR Dear Mr. Cencini, [...] It is with great disappointment that Walt Disney Company Italia aknowledged that Your Company realized and is willing to distribute a calendar named PKERS, featuring the unauthorized use of images inspired to the magazine PK thus violating her copyrights about it. Moreover, Your initiative generates not only a concrete danger of misunderstanting inside the audience about the origin of the product and makes up a penally chargeable fact, but harms the image of our Company by the use of Disney comics characters fully undressed and so absolutely against the guidelines of respect and care of our main target. Therefore this letter worths as warning to cease immediatly any publishing and/or initiative realted to such calendar. [Waiting for answer in 10 ten days or penal action will start.] Greetings. Adv. Cristina Ravelli. ----------------------------------------------- Well, if they put it like that, we're left no choice: we give up to violence. Evidently that means the calendar was so well made that they were afraid readers could confuse it with something Disney-made, because otherwise there would be no explaination why they said nothing in the past when we published very "harder" material; the product's quality, possibly related with its "ideological" side of protest against the target, probably did not like to the Company that decided to shut us up with force instead of dialogue. Therefore, because of the facts above, we have no choice but to suspend immediatly and definitely the publishing of the calendar. But we wish to add the following to our defense, since Disney shows a real misunderstanding of our intents.
Beyond all this, Disney has the legal right to care her image and we have to admit her reasons in this situation, even if we found their behaviour definitely unpleasant, to ignore us as long as we don't bother them and to shut us up as soon as we cross the line. By doing what they did they earned once more the disapproval not only of this site, but of the whole community: they care so much after their image, sometimes they should also take care of this. The only, if can be called so, satisfaction in this sad story is that finally Disney had to ADMIT our existence. Of course we'd have preferred a different way than censorship, but it finally seems evident that any try to have a friendly dialogue with these persons is useless. It is with great sadness that we see how the company does not deserve, at least from us, the love and fidelity we always paid to them even though the bad treatment we always received, nor the huge amount of free advertising we did to them. Because, we want to point this out, all we did was just for love, not for revenge or libel, but for the dream to give the audience a different and new style. But, as story teaches, the reward for loving a Cause more than your own convenience is only self-destruction.
|
|
|
The last news about fan art comes from Janim, a French pker, who sends a whole new gallery of beautiful PK
pictures computer-generated! You'll find them in the brand new
3D Art section inside the
Pktreations, restyled with a new look, faster to download
and more similar to the Pk Galaxy forum. For now there are just "sketches" of
the first 3D models, but who knows, one day all this could result in the first 3D Pk-game
made by fans... ok, better not run too fast with immagination! ^^
|
|
|
| We promised to put online the scans of Fumo
di China, but it looks someone did it before us! Thanks to Loredana
"Lk", at http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/2536/index.htm you can find a number
of photos and scans about everything Disney-related appeared on specialized magazines
during the last months... And since we're here, we recommend you to take a look at Eclyspe Neo (http://eclypse.iwebland.com), which has been updated with lots of interesting articles and new original sketches!
|
|
|
| This month we recommend you to buy, if you
can, the comic-critics magazine Fumo di China, publishing a special devoted to
Disney world, from classical to new-Disney. PK, MM, X-Mickey and Witch are widely
talked-about, and so is Muci's administration. Most interesting articles are two long
interviews to the penciler Silvio Camboni and the director Claretta Muci, then a piece destroying deeply the X-Mickey
"experiment" (we can be nastier: the abort) and a short analysis
by Marco Barlotti about the 3 series of PK (actually, a
summarized version of the article published a long ago
here)
that just like Silverware's
article titles "But, who's this Pk?" -
thanks for the quoting, Marcobar! ;). You can find also an
interview to Annachiara Tassan about the very good Mickey
Mouse novel series and an interesting piece by Gadducci and Tavosanis concerning Copyright related to Disney. The two authors
also wrote the book "Casa Disney", about the same topic. For all those who cannot acquire a copy of the magazine, next month we'll put online the scans on PKERS.
|
|
|
Another Witch-filled month is coming... at this time Silverware gives up his reviewer duties to Sarky (who is given the hard task to examinate the final match among Will and Nerissa!), who after a testing period might be confirmed as permanent reviewer. An aid become indispensable because of the great amount of job that the webmaster cannot work out alone anymore. Indeed, also the place of PK-reviewer could be soon vacant. If you think you're good enough, just start evaluating the thing, your reviews could appear on PKERS every month! We'll give you further details... "This task is up to us!"
What can I say more? For once Disney really put together a team of artists
worthy of such name (however I'm still commoved to the memory of the trio Gnone-Barbucci-Canepa. That was true poetry.)
|
|
|
| After 6 months and an unseen mass of voters,
the poll about the third series ends. The results need no further comments... What do you think about the new PK? 1.) It's great, they did very well 17 (7%) With a good majority (64%), pkers say not only say that they don't like the third series, but they feel offended by the operation carried on against us. Vox populi: nothing to say... That's our new poll: would you buy a PK or Witch romance? And with which target? Click here to vote!
|
|
|
| Since when many videogame sites over the
world began reviewing "Who is PK?", some pkers have been devoting themselves to
teach them the Truth about PK's origins, patiently making contact with dozens of reviewers
- and, in most cases, being ignored. But some, a very few, replied. Some days ago was
forwarded on Pkeri an analysis made by the american reviewer Kevin
from Videogamenews, that
decreases dramatically the perspectives of an american success of PK that Disney wanted so
bad in a childish version. We wish to share it with you because it seems very true. Text
and translation were submitted by PkRensel. Hello PkRensel, Kevin's speculations have very based reasons: in fact, decades of bad education to Disney style caused by silly cartoons have fixed on the american audience the image of duck as something that can't be anything but parodistic and ridiculous, that of course could never make something serious, and surely not act as a real superhero. Is it ever possible that no marketing expert realized that american mass culture is simply not psychologically READY to embrace the vision of a different Donald Duck?! We easily accepted PK because italian Donald Duck is not the hopeless idiot pictured by american cartoons, but in USA they've never had the chance to read those comics! And, they're telling us, nobody cares about homorous comics. Possibly the only chance to impress the audiences would have been to make an incredibly adult product to reclaim attention, and instead they popped up with this kiddy thing. What can we say but... Disney really went looking for
this!
|
![]()